september 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0287_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2019.#Swemac Innovation AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SWEMAC — Earlier national company name or trade name SWEMAC Medical Appliances AB — Relative ground for refusal — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-287/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0289_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2019.#Keolis CIF and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 – Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region – Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ – Article 107 TFEU – Article 108 TFEU – Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Limitation period – Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589.#Case T-289/17.
september 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0290_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 January 2019.#Edward Stavytskyi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation to state reasons — Plea of illegality — Principle of proportionality — Legal basis — Manifest error of assessment — Principle ne bis in idem.#Case T-290/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0291_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2019.#Transdev and Others v European Commission.#State aid — Aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 107 TFEU — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Limitation period — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589 — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-291/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0292_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2019.#Région Île-de-France v European Commission.#State aid — Aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Advantage — Selective nature — Article 107(1) TFEU — Obligation to state reasons — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589.#Case T-292/17.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0307_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 June 2019.#adidas AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing three parallel stripes — Absolute grounds for invalidity — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Form of use unable to be taken into account — Form that differs from the form under which the mark has been registered by significant variations — Inversion of the colour scheme.#Case T-307/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0309_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2019.#Organisation professionnelle des transports d'Ile de France (Optile) v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 – Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region – Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ – Article 107 TFEU – Article 108 TFEU – Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Limitation period – Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589.#Case T-309/17.
april 05, 2023 0 94 CELEX:62017TJ0323_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Martinair Holland NV v European Commission.#Case T-323/17.
marec 30, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0324: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Article 266 TFEU – State coercion – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of sales
avgust 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0324_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) – Exchange of information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Article 266 TFEU – State coercion – Single and continuous infringement – Amount of the fine – Value of s