september 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0251_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 March 2019.#Robert Bosch GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Applications for EU figurative marks Simply.Connected. — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) — Article 64 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-251/17 and T-252/17.
avgust 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0255_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 5 October 2020 (Extracts).#Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Administrative procedure – Decisions ordering an inspection – Plea of illegality against Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Right to an effective remedy – Obligation to state reasons – Right to inviolability of the home – Sufficiently strong evidence – Proportionality – Action for annulment – Complaints relating to manner of conducting the inspection – Refusal to protect the confidentiality of data relating to private life – Inadmissibility.#Case T-255/17.
september 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0287_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2019.#Swemac Innovation AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SWEMAC — Earlier national company name or trade name SWEMAC Medical Appliances AB — Relative ground for refusal — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-287/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0289_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2019.#Keolis CIF and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 – Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region – Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ – Article 107 TFEU – Article 108 TFEU – Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Limitation period – Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589.#Case T-289/17.
september 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0290_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 January 2019.#Edward Stavytskyi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation to state reasons — Plea of illegality — Principle of proportionality — Legal basis — Manifest error of assessment — Principle ne bis in idem.#Case T-290/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0291_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2019.#Transdev and Others v European Commission.#State aid — Aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 107 TFEU — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Limitation period — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589 — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-291/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0292_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2019.#Région Île-de-France v European Commission.#State aid — Aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Advantage — Selective nature — Article 107(1) TFEU — Obligation to state reasons — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589.#Case T-292/17.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0307_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 June 2019.#adidas AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing three parallel stripes — Absolute grounds for invalidity — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Form of use unable to be taken into account — Form that differs from the form under which the mark has been registered by significant variations — Inversion of the colour scheme.#Case T-307/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0309_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2019.#Organisation professionnelle des transports d'Ile de France (Optile) v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 – Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region – Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ – Article 107 TFEU – Article 108 TFEU – Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Limitation period – Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589.#Case T-309/17.
april 05, 2023 0 89 CELEX:62017TJ0323_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 March 2022.#Martinair Holland NV v European Commission.#Case T-323/17.