Search

Register

Login

× Search

Menu

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

julij 25, 2025 0 0

CELEX:62006TJ0161: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 October 2012.#Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater v European Commission.#Action for damages — ‘Culture 2000’ programme — Grants made for projects — Claims for payment of various sums — Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissible.#Case T‑161/06.

marec 21, 2022 0 0

CELEX:62009TA0286(01): Case T-286/09 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — Intel Corporation v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Microprocessors market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and of Article 54 of the EEA Agreement — Loyalty rebates — ‘Naked’ restrictions — Characterisation as abuse — As-efficient-competitor analysis — Overall strategy — Single and continuous infringement)

avgust 14, 2024 0 0

CELEX:62009TJ0286(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 January 2022.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and of Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Loyalty rebates – ‘Naked’ restrictions – Characterisation as abuse – As-efficient-competitor analysis – Overall strategy – Single and continuous infringement.#Case T-286/09 RENV.

marec 22, 2022 0 265

CELEX:62009TO0286: Rectification order of 10 March 2022.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Rectification.#Case T-286/09 RENV.

avgust 22, 2024 0 0

CELEX:62010TJ0271(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#H v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – National staff member on secondment to the EUPM in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Redeployment decision – Misuse of powers – Interests of the service – Psychological harassment – Punitive nature of the redeployment – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-271/10 RENV II.

julij 28, 2025 0 51

CELEX:62010TO0309(03): Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 February 2017.#Christoph Klein v European Commission.#Case T-309/10 RENV-REC.

september 04, 2024 0 0

CELEX:62011TJ0388_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2019.#Deutsche Post AG v European Commission.#State aid – Postal services – Financing of the additional labour and social costs relating to some of the staff of Deutsche Post by means of subsidies and revenue generated by the remuneration for price-regulated services – Decision to extend the formal investigation procedure – Decision establishing the existence of new aid on conclusion of the preliminary investigation stage – Action for annulment – Act open to challenge – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Consequences of annulment of the final decision – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-388/11.

avgust 22, 2024 0 0

CELEX:62011TJ0479(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2020.#French Republic and IFP Énergies nouvelles v European Commission.#State aid – Oil exploration – State aid scheme implemented by France – Implied and unlimited State guarantee conferred on IFPEN by the grant of the status of EPIC – Advantage – Presumption of an advantage – Proportionality.#Joined Cases T-479/11 RENV and T-157/12 RENV.

avgust 14, 2025 0 0

CELEX:62012CC0066: Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 12 September 2013.#Council of the European Union v European Commission.#Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Union — Staff Regulations — Action for annulment — Communication COM(2011) 829 final — Proposal COM(2011) 820 final — Action for failure to act — Submission of proposals on the basis of Article 10 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Failure of the Commission — Action devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate.#Case C‑66/12.

januar 16, 2016 0 623

CELEX:62012CJ0426: Sodba Sodišča (četrti senat) z dne 2. oktobra 2014. # X proti Voorzitter van het managementteam van het onderdeel Belastingdienst/Z van de rijksbelastingdienst. # Predlog za sprejet

1. Člen 2(4)(b) Direktive Sveta 2003/96/ES z dne 27. oktobra 2003 o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Sveta 2004/74/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004, je treba razlagati tako, da pri uporabi, prvič, premoga kot goriva v postopku proizvodnje sladkorja in, drugič, ogljikovega dioksida, nastalega z izgorevanjem tega energenta, za proizvodnjo kemičnih gnojil ne gre za „dvojno uporabo“ navedenega energenta v smislu te direktive.

Nasprotno, za tako „dvojno uporabo“ gre pri uporabi, prvič, premoga kot goriva v postopku proizvodnje sladkorja in, drugič, ogljikovega dioksida, ki nastane z izgorevanjem tega energenta, za namene tega postopka, če ni sporno, da postopka proizvodnje sladkorja ni mogoče izpeljati brez uporabe ogljikovega dioksida, ki nastane z izgorevanjem premoga.

2. Država članica ima pravico v svoje notranje pravo sprejeti ožje področje uporabe pojma „dvojna uporaba“ od tistega, ki je navedeno v drugi alinei člena 2(4)(b) Direktive 2003/96, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2004/74, da bi obdavčila energente, ki ne spadajo na področje uporabe te direktive.

RSS

First Previous 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 Next Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Search

Terms Of Use Privacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.

Back To Top