Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62026TO0359(01): Order of the President of the General Court of 14 September 2026.#YOU Solutions Germany GmbH v European Chemicals Agency.#Interim measures – Biocidal products – List of active substances and their suppliers provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Inclusion of a company in the list as an authorised supplier of the active substance N‑(3‑aminopropyl)‑N‑dodecylpropane‑1,3‑diamine in product-types 2 to 4 – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-359/26 R.

0 0

CELEX:62026TO0381(01):           Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 14 septembre 2026.#UC contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Marchés publics – Exclusion des procédures d’attribution de marchés encadrées par le règlement (UE, Euratom) 2024/2509 ou de la sélection pour l’exécution des fonds de l’Union – Publication d’informations – Demande de sursis à exécution – Fumus boni juris – Urgence – Mise en balance des intérêts.#Affaire T-381/26 R.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62026TO0436(01): Order of the President of the General Court of 25 September 2026.#HI v European Parliament.#Application for interim measures – Staff cases – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Decision to suspend the applicant from her functions with reduction of her remuneration to the minimum subsistence allowance and withdrawal of her access to Parliament premises and to her professional IT account – Application for suspension of operation and interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-436/26 R.

0 0

CELEX:62026TO0505:           Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 9 octobre 2026.#Sanofi R&D Vaccins contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Accès aux documents – Règlement (CE) no 1049/2001 – Décision d’accorder un accès plus large aux contrats d’achat anticipé et aux contrats d’achat conclus entre la Commission et des entreprises pharmaceutiques dans le cadre de la pandémie de COVID-19 – Rejet des objections à la divulgation d’un tiers consulté – Demande de sursis à exécution – Recevabilité – Défaut de fumus boni juris.#Affaire T-505/26 R.

This document does not exist in English.
0 3189

CELEX-Case C-392/11 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 27 September 2012 (*)

CELEX-Case C-392/11 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 27 September 2012 (*)

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the leasing of immovable property and the supplies of services linked to that leasing, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, may constitute a single supply from the point of view of value added tax. The fact that the lease gives the landlord the right to terminate it if the tenant fails to pay the service charges supports the view that there is a single supply, but does not necessarily constitute the decisive element for the purpose of assessing whether there is such a supply. On the other hand, the fact that services such as those at issue in the main proceedings could in principle be supplied by a third party does not allow the conclusion that they cannot, in the circumstances of the dispute in the main proceedings, constitute a single supply. It is for the referring court to determine whether, in the light of the interpretative guidance provided by the Court in this judgment and having regard to the particular circumstances of the case, the transactions in question are so closely linked to each other that they must be regarded as constituting a single supply of the leasing of immovable property.
RSS
First34013402340334043406340834093410Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top