Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0390:           Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 13 mai 2026.#Ixo Restauración, SL contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#* Langue de procédure : l’espagnol. Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative MUKA – Marque nationale verbale antérieure LAMUCCA – Cause de nullité relative – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Usage sérieux de la marque antérieure – Article 64, paragraphes 2 et 3, du règlement 2017/1001 – Proportionnalité – Obligation de motivation».#Affaire T-390/25.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0397: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.#A&P Deco NV v Belgische Staat.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Articles 19 and 29 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Transfer of a totality of assets or part thereof – Concomitant and separate letting contract of an immovable property – Taking over a business – Letting of a building – Building let by the transferor to the transferee of a business and used by the transferee for the purpose of carrying out the taxable activity taken over – Right of deduction – Articles 184 to 190 of Directive 2006/112 – Adjustment of the VAT deduction by the transferor.#Case T-397/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0408:           Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 7 octobre 2026.#JS contre Parlement européen.#Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Affectation à de nouvelles fonctions – Reclassement – Recours en annulation – Recevabilité – Obligation de motivation – Droit d’être entendu – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Proportionnalité – Devoir de sollicitude – Responsabilité – Préjudice moral.#Affaire T-408/25.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0409: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Bitmain Technologies Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ANTMINER – Earlier EU word mark ANTCHAIN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Identity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-409/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0409_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Bitmain Technologies Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ANTMINER – Earlier EU word mark ANTCHAIN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Identity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-409/25.

RSS
First32073208320932103212321432153216Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top