februar 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0222_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 17 décembre 2025.#Freixenet, SA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative CB – Marque nationale verbale antérieure C.B. – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Usage sérieux de la marque antérieure – Article 47, paragraphe 2, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-222/25. This document does not exist in English.
junij 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0224: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#VÁM4ALL Kft. "felszámolás alatt" v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Method for determining the customs value – Declared transaction value – Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 140 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 – Secondary methods – Article 74 of Regulation No 952/2013 – Residual or ‘fall-back’ method – Article 144 of Implementing Regulation 2015/2447 – Importation of bulk goods – Lack of proof of actual payment – Insufficient data on the essential characteristics of the goods – Use of data available in the national database – Simple arithmetic mean of unit prices.#Ca
april 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0228: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Crocs, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a shoe – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-228/25.
julij 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0228_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Crocs, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a shoe – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-228/25.
januar 15, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0229: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-229/25.
februar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0229_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-229/25.
januar 15, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0230: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-230/25.
februar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0230_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-230/25.
september 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0231: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Deva Holding Anonim Şirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Devatis – International registration of the earlier word mark NOVARTIS – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No link between the signs.#Case T-231/25.
oktober 16, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0231_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Deva Holding Anonim Şirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Devatis – International registration of the earlier word mark NOVARTIS – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No link between the signs.#Case T-231/25.