februar 25, 2026 0 32 CELEX:62025TC0184: Opinion of Advocate General Brkan delivered on 25 February 2026.###
april 23, 2026 0 20 CELEX:62025TC0268: Opinion of Advocate General Brkan delivered on 22 April 2026.###
maj 14, 2026 0 20 CELEX:62025TC0366: Opinion of Advocate General Martín y Pérez de Nanclares delivered on 13 May 2026.###
junij 04, 2026 0 14 CELEX:62025TC0383: Opinion of Advocate General Brkan delivered on 3 June 2026.###
april 16, 2026 0 26 CELEX:62025TC0397: Schlussanträge der Generalanwältin M. Brkan vom 15. April 2026.### This document does not exist in English.
junij 11, 2026 0 18 CELEX:62025TC0529: Opinion of Advocate General Martín y Pérez de Nanclares delivered on 10 June 2026.###
september 10, 2026 0 10 CELEX:62025TC0702: Opinion of Advocate General Martín y Pérez de Nanclares delivered on 9 September 2026.###
oktober 22, 2026 0 2 CELEX:62025TC0903: Conclusions de l'avocat général M. J. Martín y Pérez de Nanclares, présentées le 21 octobre 2026.### This document does not exist in English.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0003: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Zündapp Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a stylised shield with horizontal bars – International registration of the earlier figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the signs at issue.#Case T-3/25.
januar 21, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0003_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Zündapp Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a stylised shield with horizontal bars – International registration of the earlier figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the signs at issue.#Case T-3/25.