Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0313: Case T-313/25, Kinova Europe: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 3 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg – Germany) – Kinova Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hanover (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Heading 9021 – Orthopaedic appliances – Other appliances which are worn or carried, or implanted in the body, to compensate for a defect or disability – Robotic arm attached to an electric wheelchair)

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0321: Case T-321/25, JLG EMEA: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five judges) of 10 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel – Belgium) – JLG EMEA BV v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Heading 8427 – Fork-lift trucks, other works trucks fitted with lifting or handling equipment – Heading 8428 – Other lifting, handling, loading or unloading machinery (for example, lifts, escalators, conveyors, teleferics) – Boom lifts not mounted on a works truck, scissor lifts, articulated boom lifts, telescopic boom lifts, mobile vertical boom lifts – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1610 – Validity)

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0349: Case T-349/25: Judgment of the General Court of 22 April 2026 – Barranco Rodriguez and Barranco Schnitzler v EUIPO – Snowacki and Others (G MOTION) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark G MOTION – Earlier EU figurative mark GM Germany Motions – Relative grounds for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0356: Case T-356/25, Rapera: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 8 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Thessalonikis – Greece) – AY v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Tax representative appointed as the person liable for payment of VAT – Article 204 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Joint and several liability – Article 205 of Directive 2006/112 – National legislation appointing the tax representative as liable for payment of VAT and providing for his or her joint and several liability – Proportionality)

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0358: Case T-358/25: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2026 – Abramovich v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Definition of leading businesspersons operating in Russia – Definition of businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Fede

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0361: Case T-361/25, Brenntag: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 1 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – Brenntag GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Article 27(1) and (2) of Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 7(1), Article 7(2)(a), Article 20(2) and Article 30 of Directive 2008/118/EC – Irregularity occurring during the movement of excise goods – Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement – Levying of excise duty due to the absence of an accompanying document specific to excise goods)

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0376: Case T-376/25: Judgment of the General Court of 2 September 2026 – Puma v EUIPO – Sir Safety System (Representation of a footwear sole) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Design representing a footwear sole – Prior EU designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of attention of an informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822)

RSS
First31633164316531663168317031713172Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top