november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0034: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Centex SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark OWN – Earlier national word mark my own – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-34/25.
februar 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0034_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Centex SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark OWN – Earlier national word mark my own – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-34/25.
julij 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0040: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-40/25.
julij 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0040_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-40/25.
julij 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0041: Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant une guirlande électrique – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-41/25. This document does not exist in English.
julij 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0041_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant une guirlande électrique – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-41/25. This document does not exist in English.
julij 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0042: Urteil des Gerichts (Erste Kammer) vom 1. Juli 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsgeschmacksmuster – Nichtigkeitsverfahren – Eingetragenes Unionsgeschmacksmuster, das einen Lampenschirm darstellt – Nichtigkeitsgrund – Nichterfüllung der Schutzvoraussetzungen – Art. 25 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 6/2002 – Fehlende Eigenart – Art. 6 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002 – Ermittlung des Sachverhalts von Amts wegen – Art. 63 Abs. 1 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002.#Rechtssache T-42/25. This document does not exist in English.
julij 31, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0042_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant un abat-jour – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection ‑ Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-42/25. This document does not exist in English.
januar 21, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0043: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a curved stripe and an irregular triangle inside a black rectangle – Earlier EU figurative marks representing one or more white curved stripes ascending to the right – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-43/25.
april 29, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0043_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a curved stripe and an irregular triangle inside a black rectangle – Earlier EU figurative marks representing one or more white curved stripes ascending to the right – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-43/25.