februar 25, 2026 0 23 CELEX:62025TC0184: Opinion of Advocate General Brkan delivered on 25 February 2026.###
april 23, 2026 0 13 CELEX:62025TC0268: Opinion of Advocate General Brkan delivered on 22 April 2026.###
maj 14, 2026 0 12 CELEX:62025TC0366: Opinion of Advocate General Martín y Pérez de Nanclares delivered on 13 May 2026.###
april 16, 2026 0 17 CELEX:62025TC0397: Schlussanträge der Generalanwältin M. Brkan vom 15. April 2026.### This document does not exist in English.
junij 11, 2026 0 9 CELEX:62025TC0529: Opinion of Advocate General Martín y Pérez de Nanclares delivered on 10 June 2026.###
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0003: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Zündapp Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a stylised shield with horizontal bars – International registration of the earlier figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the signs at issue.#Case T-3/25.
januar 21, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0003_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Zündapp Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a stylised shield with horizontal bars – International registration of the earlier figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the signs at issue.#Case T-3/25.
marec 11, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0006: Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#QI contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Harcèlement moral – Article 12 bis du statut – Demande d’assistance – Article 24 du statut – Rejet de la demande – Faits nouveaux et substantiels pouvant justifier la présentation d’une demande tendant au réexamen d’une décision antérieure – Commencement de preuve du harcèlement moral allégué – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-6/25. This document does not exist in English.
marec 11, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TJ0007: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Daniel Puppan contre Parlement européen.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Notation – Exercice de notation 2023 – Rapport de notation – Recours en annulation – Délai de recours – Irrecevabilité – Promotion – Exercice de promotion 2023 – Attribution de points de mérite – Obligation de motivation – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-7/25. This document does not exist in English.