Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0057_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Transportes Centrais de Vergadela, Unipessoal, Lda v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark iTEC SkyNex – Earlier EU word mark SKYNET – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-57/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0058_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Transportes Centrais de Vergadela, Unipessoal, Lda v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark iTEC SKYNEX – Earlier EU word mark SKYNET – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-58/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0062: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Shenzen Smoore Technology Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark V VENILO – Earlier EU figurative mark V – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Earlier mark’s lack of enhanced distinctiveness acquired through use – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-62/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0062_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Shenzen Smoore Technology Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark V VENILO – Earlier EU figurative mark V – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Earlier mark’s lack of enhanced distinctiveness acquired through use – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-62/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0069_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 February 2026.#A GmbH v Hauptzollamt C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Interpretation – Concept of ‘goods put up in sets’ consisting of two or more separate constituents – Note 3 to Section VI of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87.#Case T-69/25.

RSS
First30803081308230833085308730883089Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top