april 27, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0072: Case T-72/25: Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2026 – Viva Credit v EUIPO – Viva Wallet (Vivawallet) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Vivawallet – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
april 27, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0073: Case T-73/25: Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2026 – Viva Credit v EUIPO – Viva Wallet (Viva) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Viva – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
april 07, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0076: Case T-76/25: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2026 – HO v Europol (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Decision not to renew for an indefinite period – Requirement of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment)
maj 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0077: Case T-77/25: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – Debonair v EUIPO – Loewe (AOURA) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark AOURA – Earlier EU word mark AURA LOEWE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
marec 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0078: Case T-78/25: Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2026 – Synonym Software v EUIPO (PAYKIT) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark PAYKIT – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration)
julij 27, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0080: Case T-80/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Xpand Consortium and Others v Commission (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Development, implementation, maintenance/operations, advice and consultancy services in accounting/finance and financial IT systems – Cancellation of the procurement procedure – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations)
februar 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0081: Case T-81/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – LTV Leuchten & Lampen v EUIPO – XAL (Lamps) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lamp – Prior designs – Ground for invalidity – No disclosure of the prior designs – Prior designs produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Procedural irregularities before the Cancellation Division – Refusal to grant the applicant’s requests for measures of inquiry and for an oral hearing – Misuse of powers)
februar 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0082: Case T-82/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – LTV Leuchten & Lampen v EUIPO – XAL (Lighting fittings) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lighting fitting – Prior designs – Ground for invalidity – No disclosure of the prior designs – Prior designs produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Procedural irregularities before the Cancellation Division – Refusal to grant the applicant’s requests for measures of inquiry and for an oral hearing – Misuse of powers)
junij 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0087: Case T-87/25: Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2026 – Westfälisches Textilwerk Adolf Ahlers v Commission (Competition – Agreement, decisions and concerted practices – Market for Pierre Cardin-licensed clothing and accessories for men, women and children – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Fine – Error of law – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction)
julij 27, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0099: Case T-99/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – European Public Prosecutor’s Office v European Court of Auditors (Law governing the institutions – Investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Refusal by the Court of Auditors to lift the duty of confidentiality of persons called to be heard as witnesses in the investigation – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Cooperation in good faith – Article 19 of the Staff Regulations – Interests of the Union)