januar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0545: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 17 December 2025.#České dráhy, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Markets for the provision of domestic long-distance rail passenger transport services in the Czech Republic and for the provision of international long-distance rail passenger transport services between Austria and the Czech Republic on the Prague-Vienna route – Access to used railway wagons for long-distance passenger transport in those markets – European Commission decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Action for annulment – Co-perpetrator of that infringement – Interest in the result of the case – None.#Case C-545/25 P(I).
februar 25, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0545_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 17 December 2025.#České dráhy, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Markets for the provision of domestic long-distance rail passenger transport services in the Czech Republic and for the provision of international long-distance rail passenger transport services between Austria and the Czech Republic on the Prague-Vienna route – Access to used railway wagons for long-distance passenger transport in those markets – European Commission decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Action for annulment – Co-perpetrator of that infringement – Interest in the result of the case – None.#Case C-545/25 P(I).
julij 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0555: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 30 juin 2026.#RL contre AL.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-555/25. This document does not exist in English.
marec 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0561: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#BF contre ZAD « Allianz Bulgaria Zhivot ».#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte réglementaire du litige au principal et des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse à la question préjudicielle – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-561/25. This document does not exist in English.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0564: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#FL contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale (Eurojust) et Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol).#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération des autorités de police et autres services répressifs des États membres – Article 340 TFUE – Règlement (UE) 2016/794 – Article 50, paragraphe 1 – Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol) – Prétendu traitement illicite de données à caractère personnel transmises à Europol par des autorités nationales – Réalité du préjudice prétendument subi – Pourvoi en partie manifesteme This document does not exist in English.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0565: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#CW contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale (Eurojust) et Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol).#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération des autorités de police et autres services répressifs des États membres – Article 340 TFUE – Règlement (UE) 2016/794 – Article 50, paragraphe 1 – Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol) – Prétendu traitement illicite de données à caractère personnel transmises à Europol par des autorités nationales – Réalité du préjudice prétendument subi – Pourvoi manifestement non fon This document does not exist in English.
julij 23, 2026 0 3 CELEX:62025CO0565_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#CW v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Case C-565/25 P.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0566: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#FF v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Article 340 TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-contractual liability of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data transmitted to Europol by national authorities – Reality of the damage allegedly suffered – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-566/25 P.
julij 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0566_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#FF v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Article 340 TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-contractual liability of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data transmitted to Europol by national authorities – Reality of the damage allegedly suffered – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-566/25 P.
julij 29, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0574: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2026.#Balneari Rimini v Comune di Rimini.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(a) and (c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Manifest inadmissibility in part – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 12(1) and (2) – Directive 2014/23/EU – Scope – Concessions of State-owned coastal land used for tourism and recreational purposes – Action for damages – Legislation providing for the automatic extension of those concessions – Scarcity of natural resources – Authority competent to ass