Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0367: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 October 2024.#Evroins inshurans grup AD v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Interim relief – European System of Financial Supervisors – Mechanism enabling EIOPA to deal with breaches of EU law by the national authorities in their supervisory activities – Decision not to open an investigation – Refusal of a request not to publish a decision – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-367/24 R.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0367_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 October 2024.#Evroins inshurans grup AD v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Interim relief – European System of Financial Supervisors – Mechanism enabling EIOPA to deal with breaches of EU law by the national authorities in their supervisory activities – Decision not to open an investigation – Refusal of a request not to publish a decision – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-367/24 R.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0373:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 7 mai 2025.#Debrégeas et associés Pharma (D&A Pharma) contre Agence européenne des médicaments.#Recours en annulation – Médicaments à usage humain – Autorisation de mise sur le marché de l’Alcover granules – Avis scientifique défavorable du comité des médicaments à usage humain – Rejet d’une demande de “rétractation” – Absence d’intérêt à agir – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-373/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024TO0374: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 201

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0374_INF: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0384:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 16 octobre 2026.#Ammar Sharif contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises en raison de la situation en Syrie – Gel des fonds – Restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Maintien du nom du requérant sur les listes – Critère du lien avec des membres des familles Assad ou Makhlouf – Exception d’illégalité – Erreurs d’appréciation – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondem

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024TO0392: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2024.#Raf Verbeke and Elias Vlerick v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2024/1263 – Regulation (EU) 2024/1264 – Directive (EU) 2024/1265 – Legislative act – Act entailing implementing measures – Lack of direct concern – Manifest inadmissibility – Request for ‘constitutional dialogue’ with the Cour constitutionnelle (Constitutional Court, Belgium) – Clear lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-392/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0392_RES: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2024.#Raf Verbeke and Elias Vlerick v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2024/1263 – Regulation (EU) 2024/1264 – Directive (EU) 2024/1265 – Legislative act – Act entailing implementing measures – Lack of direct concern – Manifest inadmissibility – Request for ‘constitutional dialogue’ with the Cour constitutionnelle (Constitutional Court, Belgium) – Clear lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-392/24.

RSS
First30063007300830093011301330143015Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top