junij 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0615: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 June 2025.#Asociación de ciudadanos contra la corrupción y para la defensa del estado de derecho v European Ombudsman.#Action for annulment – Decision of the Ombudsman not to open an inquiry following a complaint – Act not open to challenge – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Manifest inadmissibility in part.#Case T-615/24.
junij 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0615_RES: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 June 2025.#Asociación de ciudadanos contra la corrupción y para la defensa del estado de derecho v European Ombudsman.#Action for annulment – Decision of the Ombudsman not to open an inquiry following a complaint – Act not open to challenge – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Manifest inadmissibility in part.#Case T-615/24.
april 03, 2026 0 12 CELEX:62024TO0617: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#Nokia Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Rectification.#Case T-617/24 REC.
september 26, 2025 0 8 CELEX:62024TO0658(01)_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 April 2025.#Warbud S.A. v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Interim relief – Public works contracts – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-658/24 R.
november 29, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0660: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 November 2025.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark G CORE – Earlier EU word mark CORE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-660/24.
april 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0660_INF: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 November 2025.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark G CORE – Earlier EU word mark CORE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-660/24.
marec 27, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0666(01): Order of the President of the General Court of 27 March 2025.#Teva Pharma BV v European Medicines Agency.#Interim relief – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the EMA’s scientific advice given pursuant to Article 57(1)(n) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Decision to grant a third party access to the documents – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-666/24 R.
september 26, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0666(01)_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 27 March 2025.#Teva Pharma BV v European Medicines Agency.#Interim relief – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the EMA’s scientific advice given pursuant to Article 57(1)(n) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Decision to grant a third party access to the documents – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-666/24 R.
julij 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0668: Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 1er juillet 2025.#Santos SAS contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Recours en annulation – Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne tridimensionnelle – Forme d’un presse-agrumes – Motif absolu de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif acquis par l’usage – Article 7, paragraphe 3, du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-668/24. This document does not exist in English.
julij 11, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0670: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 July 2026.#Recrytera Srl v European Commission.#Actions for annulment – Public procurement – Tendering procedure – Provision of computer-based testing services and related services for the selection of EU staff – Contract notice – Implicit decision not to acquire on-site computer-based testing services – Decision to award the contract – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Cases T-670/24 and T-607/25.