oktober 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0568: Beschluss des Gerichts (Sechste Kammer) vom 25. September 2025.#VTB Bank PAO gegen Europäische Zentralbank.#Nichtigkeitsklage – Wirtschafts- und Währungspolitik – Aufsicht über Kreditinstitute – Entzug der Zulassung eines Kreditinstituts – Leumund des Erwerbers eines Kreditinstituts – Klagebefugnis eines Anteilseigners – Keine unmittelbare Betroffenheit – Unzulässigkeit – Antrag auf Erteilung einer Anordnung – Offensichtliche Unzuständigkeit.#Rechtssache T-568/24. This document does not exist in English.
januar 15, 2026 0 13 CELEX:62024TO0568_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#VTB Bank PAO v European Central Bank.#Case T-568/24.
oktober 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0570: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#Modul University Vienna GmbH v European Health and Digital Executive Agency.#Action for annulment – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Prohibition on entering into legal commitments with a public interest trust established on the basis of Hungarian Act No IX of 2021 or with an entity maintained by such a public interest trust – Decision not to enter into a new legal commitment with the applicant – Identification of the defendant – Partial inadmissibility.#Case T-570/24.
februar 03, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0570_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#Modul University Vienna GmbH v European Health and Digital Executive Agency.#Action for annulment – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Prohibition on entering into legal commitments with a public interest trust established on the basis of Hungarian Act No IX of 2021 or with an entity maintained by such a public interest trust – Decision not to enter into a new legal commitment with the applicant – Identification of the defendant – Partial inadmissibility.#Case T-570/24.
januar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0571: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 January 2026.#Pic Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PIC – Earlier EU word mark PIC – Relative ground for invalidity – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Relevant periods – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-571/24.
februar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0571_INF: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 January 2026.#Pic Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PIC – Earlier EU word mark PIC – Relative ground for invalidity – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Relevant periods – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-571/24.
februar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0587: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#GE v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure – Clarification of references to the annexes – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-587/24.
julij 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0587_INF: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#GE v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure – Clarification of references to the annexes – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-587/24.
marec 05, 2025 0 19 CELEX:62024TO0595(01): Order of the President of the General Court of 27 February 2025.#Capgemini España, SL and UniSystems Luxembourg Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-595/24 R.