Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0374: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 201

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0374_INF: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0392: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2024.#Raf Verbeke and Elias Vlerick v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2024/1263 – Regulation (EU) 2024/1264 – Directive (EU) 2024/1265 – Legislative act – Act entailing implementing measures – Lack of direct concern – Manifest inadmissibility – Request for ‘constitutional dialogue’ with the Cour constitutionnelle (Constitutional Court, Belgium) – Clear lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-392/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0392_RES: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2024.#Raf Verbeke and Elias Vlerick v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2024/1263 – Regulation (EU) 2024/1264 – Directive (EU) 2024/1265 – Legislative act – Act entailing implementing measures – Lack of direct concern – Manifest inadmissibility – Request for ‘constitutional dialogue’ with the Cour constitutionnelle (Constitutional Court, Belgium) – Clear lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-392/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0408: Order of the President of the General Court of 5 November 2024.#Intrawork OÜ and Others v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Interim relief – Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – Publication of a call for tenders – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-408/24 R.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0408_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 5 November 2024.#Intrawork OÜ and Others v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Interim relief – Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – Publication of a call for tenders – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-408/24 R.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0430:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (première chambre) du 24 juillet 2025.#Yuri Schefler contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Recours en annulation – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions de la Russie déstabilisant la situation en Ukraine – Interdiction à tout aéronef non immatriculé en Russie détenu, affrété ou contrôlé d’une autre manière par une personne physique ou morale, une entité ou un organisme russe d’atterrir sur le territoire de l’Union, d’en décoller ou de le survoler – Personne physique russe en mesure de déterminer effectivement le lieu ou l’heure de décollage ou d’atterrissage d’un vol non régulier – Article 3 quinquies du règlement (UE) no 833/2014 – Acte réglementaire comportant des mesures d’exécut

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First29352936293729382940294229432944Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top