Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0134: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 January 2026.#D S.A. v P S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Compensation to passengers in the event of a long delay or cancellation of a flight – Exemption – Extraordinary circumstances – Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Air traffic management decision – Allocation of delayed departure slots due to adverse weather conditions – Possibility of relying on a flight subsequent to that affected by the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance.#Case T-134/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0140:           Urteil des Gerichts (Achte Kammer) vom 14. Januar 2026.#Variuscard Produktions- und Handels GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung der Unionswortmarke CRYPTOSTAMP – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Beschreibender Charakter – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. c der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Gleichbehandlung – Grundsatz der guten Verwaltung.#Rechtssache T-140/25.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0140_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Variuscard Produktions- und Handels GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale CRYPTOSTAMP – Motif absolu de refus – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Égalité de traitement – Principe de bonne administration.#Affaire T-140/25.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0142: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Médis - Companhia portuguesa de seguros de saúde, S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark WelMedis – Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark médis – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-142/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0142_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Médis - Companhia portuguesa de seguros de saúde, S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark WelMedis – Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark médis – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-142/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0177: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 January 2026.#C. sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Gdańsku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Import and export procedures – Tariff quotas – Exhaustion of the quota on the first day of its opening – No quota number integrated into the TARIC code – Subsequent amendment of the customs declaration in order to benefit from inclusion in the quota – Concept of ‘amendment [permitting] the declarant to comply with his or her obligations relating to the placing of the goods under the customs procedure concerned’ – Article 173(3) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013.#Case T-177/25.

0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0195:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Friedrich Erlbacher contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Avis de vacance – Poste de directeur – Rejet de candidature – Acte faisant grief – Recevabilité – Incompétence de l’auteur de l’acte – Critères d’éligibilité – Notion de “fonction d’encadrement intermédiaire” – Erreur de droit.#Affaire T-195/25.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62025TJ0195_RES:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Friedrich Erlbacher contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Avis de vacance – Poste de directeur – Rejet de candidature – Acte faisant grief – Recevabilité – Incompétence de l’auteur de l’acte – Critères d’éligibilité – Notion de “fonction d’encadrement intermédiaire” – Erreur de droit.#Affaire T-195/25.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First28932894289528962898290029012902Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top