oktober 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0044: Order of the Court of 1 October 2025.#Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-44/25 P.
junij 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0046: Order of the Court of 17 June 2025.#Sven Butzkies-Schiemann v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-46/25 P.
september 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0046_INF: Order of the Court of 17 June 2025.#Sven Butzkies-Schiemann v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-46/25 P.
maj 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0049: Order of the Court of 22 May 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-49/25 P.
oktober 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0049_INF: Order of the Court of 22 May 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-49/25 P.
julij 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0054(01): Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 23 July 2025.#European Commission v Ortis SA.#Interim relief – Appeal – Articles 278 and 279 TFEU – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Application for suspension of the effects of provisions of a regulation that have been annulled by the General Court of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – First and second entries in point 1 and first and second entries in point 2 of Article 1 – Urgency.#Case C-54/25 P-R.
oktober 13, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0114: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 6 octobre 2025.#SV contre CY.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Directive (UE) 2024/1069 – Applicabilité ratione temporis et ratione materiae – Incompétence manifeste de la Cour – Directive (UE) 2019/1937 – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-114/25. This document does not exist in English.
oktober 29, 2025 0 8 CELEX:62025CO0114_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2025.#SV v CY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-114/25.
januar 07, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0124: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 5 décembre 2025.#VA contre BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 100, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Litige au principal devenu sans objet – Non-lieu à statuer.#Affaire C-124/25. This document does not exist in English.
marec 10, 2026 0 8 CELEX:62025CO0124_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 December 2025.#VA v BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie.#Case C-124/25.