februar 16, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CN0865: Case C-865/25 P: Appeal brought on 23 December 2025 by Red Bull GmbH, Red Bull France SASU and Red Bull Nederland BV against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), delivered on 15 October 2025 in Case T-306/23, Red Bull GmbH, Red Bull France SASU, Red Bull Nederland BV v European Commission
februar 16, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CN0869: Case C-869/25 P: Appeal brought on 26 December 2025 by UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 29 October 2025 in Case T-742/20 RENV, UPL Europe and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) v Commission
julij 02, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0006: Order of the Court of 25 June 2025.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue raised by the appeal is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-6/25 P.
september 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0006_INF: Order of the Court of 25 June 2025.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue raised by the appeal is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-6/25 P.
oktober 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0013: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 1er octobre 2025.#OU contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Défaut de clarté et de précision des moyens – Pourvoi manifestement irrecevable.#Affaire C-13/25 P. This document does not exist in English.
december 11, 2025 0 4 CELEX:62025CO0013_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#OU v European Commission.#Case C-13/25 P.
julij 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0016: Order of the Court of 8 July 2025.#Finastra International Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-16/25 P.
oktober 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0016_INF: Order of the Court of 8 July 2025.#Finastra International Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-16/25 P.
maj 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0018: Beschluss des Gerichtshofs vom 21. Mai 2025.#Aeneas GmbH & Co. KG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Rechtsmittel – Unionsmarke – Zulassung von Rechtsmitteln – Art. 170b der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Antrag, in dem die Bedeutsamkeit einer Frage für die Einheit, die Kohärenz oder die Entwicklung des Unionsrechts nicht dargetan wird – Nichtzulassung des Rechtsmittels.#Rechtssache C-18/25 P. This document does not exist in English.
september 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0019: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 septembre 2025.#« ClaimCompass » EOOD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94, sous c), du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour ainsi que du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-19/25. This document does not exist in English.