september 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0582: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.
november 29, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0582_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.
oktober 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0585: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Article 91(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-585/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0585_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Article 91(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-585/24.
oktober 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0586: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-586/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0586_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-586/24.
julij 16, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0588: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#OT contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Erreur d’appréciation – Droits de la défense.#Affaire T-588/24. This document does not exist in English.
april 16, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0589: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 15 April 2026.#A-GmbH v Hauptzollamt C.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Customs Code – Outward processing procedure – Authorisation – Fifth indent of Article 84(1)(b) and Article 85 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 211(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Placement for export at a customs office not designated in the authorisation and situated in a Member State other than that which granted the authorisation – Customs debt incurred through non-compliance – Relief – Article 86(6) of Regulation No 952/2013 – Customs debt incurred pursuant to Article 77(1)(a) of Regulation No 952/2013.#Case T-589/24.
julij 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0591: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Sandoz AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ARYUNA – Earlier Benelux and national word marks ARMUNIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-591/24.
julij 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0591_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Sandoz AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ARYUNA – Earlier Benelux and national word marks ARMUNIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-591/24.