april 29, 2026 0 8 CELEX:62024TJ0117_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#CQ v European Economic and Social Committee.#Case T-117/24.
marec 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0118: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Rosalia Vila Tobella v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark ROZALIYA jewelry for enlightenment – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Articles 94 and 95 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-118/24.
julij 31, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0118_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Rosalia Vila Tobella v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark ROZALIYA jewelry for enlightenment – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Articles 94 and 95 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-118/24.
julij 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0121: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative marks representing three Chinese characters – Word mark WANG LAO JI – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-121/24 to T-127/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0121_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative marks representing three Chinese characters – Word mark WANG LAO JI – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-121/24 to T-127/24 and T-129/24.
julij 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0128: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark representing three Chinese characters – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-128/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0128_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark representing three Chinese characters – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-128/24.
julij 02, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0131: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 2 juillet 2025.#CR contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Pension d’ancienneté – Réformes du statut de 2004 et de 2014 – Mesures transitoires relatives à certaines modalités de calcul des droits à pension – Article 28 de l’annexe XIII du statut – Agents contractuels devenus fonctionnaires – Taux annuel d’acquisition des droits à pension – Âge de départ à la retraite – Champ d’application de la loi – Égalité de traitement.#Affaire T-131/24. This document does not exist in English.
julij 07, 2025 0 38 CELEX:62024TJ0131_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#CR v European Commission.#Case T-131/24.
oktober 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0133_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 May 2025.#KnitPro International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing chevrons between two parallel lines – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Examination of the grounds for invalidity by the Grand Board of Appeal.#Case T-133/24.