december 18, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0037: Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 17 décembre 2025.#CB contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Recrutement – Concours général EPSO/AST/150/21 – Décision de ne pas inscrire le nom du requérant sur la liste de réserve – Égalité de traitement.#Affaire T-37/24. This document does not exist in English.
julij 23, 2026 0 3 CELEX:62024TJ0037_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#CB v European Commission.#Case T-37/24.
november 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0038_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#OMV AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Mark consisting in a combination of the colours blue and green – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Sound administration – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-38/24.
november 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0039: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Laboratorio SYS, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark sYs – Earlier national figurative marks S&S cosmética natural – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-39/24.
julij 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0039_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Laboratorio SYS, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark sYs – Earlier national figurative marks S&S cosmética natural – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-39/24.
marec 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0040: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTSOY – Earlier PDO ‘Port’ – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-40/24.
oktober 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0040_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTSOY – Earlier PDO ‘Port’ – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-40/24.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0041: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 19 novembre 2025.#LGAI Technological Center, SA et jtsec Beyond IT Security, SL contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour le programme spatial.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Services d’accréditation de sécurité – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire – Règlement (UE) 2021/696 – Programme spatial – Condition selon laquelle l’entité juridique éligible n’est pas soumise au contrôle d’un pays tiers ou d’une entité de pays tiers – Droit d’être entendu – Obligation de motivation – Obligation d’examen des offres conforme aux critères énoncés dans les documents de marché – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Proportionnalité.#Affaire T-41/24. This document does not exist in English.
julij 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0041_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 19 novembre 2025.#LGAI Technological Center, SA et jtsec Beyond IT Security, SL contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour le programme spatial.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Services d’accréditation de sécurité – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire – Règlement (UE) 2021/696 – Programme spatial – Condition selon laquelle l’entité juridique éligible n’est pas soumise au contrôle d’un pays tiers ou d’une entité de pays tiers – Droit d’être entendu – Obligation de motivation – Obligation d’examen des offres conforme aux critères énoncés dans les documents de marché – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Proportionnalité.#Affaire T-41/24. This document does not exist in English.
april 02, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0044: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Marzena Porczyńska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark gappol – Earlier EU word mark GAP – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 54(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Reimbursement of the c