julij 25, 2025 0 9 CELEX:62024TO0085_INF: Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 January 2025.#Münchner Wohnen GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-85/24.
junij 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0087_INF: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2025.#Štefan Košovan v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Voltwagen – Earlier EU word mark VOLKSWAGEN – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-87/24.
november 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0100: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2024.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SCIO THETA – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-100/24.
februar 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0101: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SCIO – Earlier non-registered mark SCIO – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundation
julij 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0101_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SCIO – Earlier non-registered mark SCIO – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundat
februar 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0102: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any found
julij 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0102_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any f
februar 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0103: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any found
julij 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0103_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any f
april 30, 2024 0 16 CELEX:62024TO0106(01): Order of the President of the General Court of 25 April 2024.#Corporate & Public Management Consulting International OÜ v European Commission.#Case T-106/24 R.