Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0179_RES: Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 May 2025.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission.#Action for annulment – European System of Financial Supervision – Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law – Formal opinion of the Commission on actions necessary to comply with EU law – Article 17(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 – Actionable measure – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-179/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0204: Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 May 2025.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for annulment – European System of Financial Supervision – Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law – Recommendation of EIOPA on actions to be taken to comply with EU law – Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-204/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0204_RES: Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 May 2025.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for annulment – European System of Financial Supervision – Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law – Recommendation of EIOPA on actions to be taken to comply with EU law – Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-204/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0205: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark JUST STEP IN – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-205/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0205_INF: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark JUST STEP IN – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-205/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0206: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HOODLESS HOODIES – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-206/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0206_INF: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HOODLESS HOODIES – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-206/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0213(01): Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 May 2025.#Cortex Havacilik ve Turizm Ticaret AŞ v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the Union – Articles 3d and 12 of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Act not amenable to review – Inadmissibility.#Case T-213/24.

RSS
First27862787278827892791279327942795Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top