julij 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0505: Case T-505/24: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – KenWave Solutions v EUIPO (DYNAMIC RESPONSE IMAGING) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark DYNAMIC RESPONSE IMAGING – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
avgust 18, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0513: Case T-513/24: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – Lunar Outpost v EUIPO (LUNAR OUTPOST) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark LUNAR OUTPOST – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
november 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0516: Case T-516/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists v EUIPO – R. López de Heredia Viña Tondonia (LOPEZ DE HEREDIA) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark LOPEZ DE HEREDIA – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the mark – Nature and extent of the use – Proof of genuine use)
marec 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0517: Case T-517/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2026 – Froneri Bulgaria v EUIPO – Daesef (Box with lid) (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a box with a lid – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Novelty – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822)
februar 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0518: Case T-518/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – Cin Valentine v EUIPO – Daw (VAL --- ACRYL) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VAL – ACRYL – Earlier EU word mark Malacryl – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
november 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0522: Case T-522/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Seven.One Entertainment Group v EUIPO – Celik (GERMANY’S NEXT top kebab by Uncle Charlie) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GERMANY’S NEXT top kebab by Uncle Charlie – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
januar 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0524: Case T-524/24: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Vassilev & Chisuse v EUIPO – Vayanos Kostopoulos (VC LAW) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark VC LAW – Earlier EU word mark vklaw – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
oktober 13, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0525: Case T-525/24: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – Princesse de Paris v EUIPO – Printsesa Sheih Khaled i s-ie (Princesse de Paris) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Princesse de Paris – Earlier national figurative mark Princess P Gold – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001)
junij 08, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0528: Case T-528/24: Judgment of the General Court of 22 April 2026 –Chevtsov v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment)
december 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0530: Case T-530/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – FU v Parliament (Civil service – Officials – Social security – Article 73 of the Staff Regulations – Accident – Rejection of the accident report – Out of time submission of the accident report – Failure to observe the period of 10 working days from the occurrence of the accident – Concept of lawful reason)