februar 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0022: Case T-22/24: Judgment of the General Court of 4 December 2024 – Jula v EUIPO – Mula (Mula) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Mula – Earlier EU word mark Jula – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Visual and phonetic similarity)
april 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0023: Case T-23/24: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – IVDP v EUIPO – Vinoquel- Vinhos Oscar Quevedo (Quevedo Port) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Quevedo Port – Earlier PDO Porto/Port – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of use and evocation of a PDO)
april 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0026: Case T-26/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Funline International v EUIPO – MS Trade (JUNGLE JUICE) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUNGLE JUICE – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility)
februar 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0030: Case T-30/24: Judgment of the General Court of 4 December 2024 – Puma v EUIPO – Li Puma (Li Puma Design) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Li Puma Design – Earlier EU figurative marks PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Link between the marks at issue)
december 16, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0034: Case T-34/24: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – CA v Court of Auditors (Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2023 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 8 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Consideration of comparative merits – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination)
februar 16, 2026 0 14 CELEX:62024TA0037: Case T-37/24: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2025 – CB v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AST/150/21 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment)
julij 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0038: Case T-38/24: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – OMV v EUIPO (Combination of the colours blue and green) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Mark consisting in a combination of the colours blue and green – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Sound administration – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
februar 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0039: Case T-39/24: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2024 – Laboratorio SYS v EUIPO – Dr. Babor (sYs) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark sYs – Earlier national figurative marks S&S cosmética natural – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
april 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0040: Case T-40/24: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – IVDP v EUIPO – The Benriach Distillery Company (PORTSOY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTSOY – Earlier PDO Port – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of use and evocation of a PDO)
januar 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TA0041: Case T-41/24: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – LGAI Technological Center and jtsec Beyond IT Security v EUSPA (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Security accreditation services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Regulation (EU) 2021/696 – Space programme – Condition that the eligible legal entity is not controlled by a third country or a third-country entity – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to examine tenders in accordance with the criteria set out in the procurement documents – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality)