Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0585: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Article 91(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-585/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0585_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Article 91(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-585/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0586: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-586/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0586_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-586/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0592: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#European Federation of Financial Analysts'Societies (EFFAS) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst – Earlier EU word mark CFA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of peaceful coexistence.#Case T-592/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0592_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#European Federation of Financial Analysts'Societies (EFFAS) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst – Earlier EU word mark CFA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of peaceful coexistence.#Case T-592/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0594:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 4 mars 2026.#Compass-Datenbank GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Accès aux documents – Règlement (CE) no 1049/2001 – Contenu de la plate-forme centrale européenne – Interconnexion des registres du commerce ou des sociétés dans le UE Business Registers Interconnection System – Décision 2011/833/UE – Refus d’accès – Présomption de véracité attachée à la déclaration de non-possession de documents.#Affaire T-594/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0599:           Urteil des Gerichts (Achte Kammer) vom 3. September 2025.#LTV Leuchten & Lampen Vertriebs GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsgeschmacksmuster – Nichtigkeitsverfahren – Eingetragenes Unionsgeschmacksmuster, das eine Leuchte darstellt – Älteres Geschmacksmuster – Nichtigkeitsgrund – Kollision mit einem älteren Geschmacksmuster – Fehlende Eigenart – Informierter Benutzer – Kein anderer Gesamteindruck – Mündliche Verhandlung und Beweisaufnahme – Verletzung wesentlicher Formvorschriften – Ermessensmissbrauch.#Rechtssache T-599/24.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First27152716271727182720272227232724Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top