oktober 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0499_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 – Imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Calculation of the normal value – Fair comparison – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 2(5) – Article 2(10)(j) – Adjustments – Conversion of currencies – Hedging gains and losses – Article 18(3) and (6) – Cooperation of the interested parties.#Case C-499/24 P.
november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0500: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Grupo Massimo Dutti SA v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Determination – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 147 – Successive sales.#Case C-500/24.
februar 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0500_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Grupo Massimo Dutti SA v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Determination – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 147 – Successive sales.#Case C-500/24.
september 11, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0507: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2026.#YS v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Article 16 – Appointment of European Prosecutors – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by the Hellenic Republic – Rules applicable to the appointment of European Prosecutors – Action for annulment – Plea alleging that the proposal for appointment from the Member State concerned is unlawful – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court.#Case C-507/24 P.
september 11, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0507_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 10 septembre 2026.#YS contre Conseil de l'Union européenne et Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Droit institutionnel – Coopération renforcée concernant la création du Parquet européen – Règlement (UE) 2017/1939 – Article 16 – Nomination des procureurs européens – Nomination de l’un des candidats désignés par la République hellénique – Règles applicables à la nomination des procureurs européens – Recours en annulation – Motif tiré de l’illégalité de la proposition de nomination émanant de l’État membre concerné – Incompétence du Tribunal.#Affaire C-507/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
november 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0509: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Investcapital Ltd v M.H.S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Contract concerning a bank account – Order for payment procedure – Review of the court’s own motion of whether contractual terms are unfair – Proposal by the court to reduce the claim by the amount corresponding to the application of a term considered to be unfair – Acceptance by the seller or supplier and possibility to claim that amount in subsequent proceedings – Principle of effectiveness – Participation of the consumer in the review of whether a contractual term is unfair.#Case C-509/24.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0509_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Investcapital Ltd v M.H.S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción de Arucas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Contract concerning a bank account – Order for payment procedure – Review of the court’s own motion of whether contractual terms are unfair – Proposal by the court to reduce the claim by the amount corresponding to the application of a term considered to be unfair – Acceptance by the seller or supplier and possibility to claim that amount in subsequent proceedings – Principle of effectiveness – Participation of the consumer in the review of whether a contractual te
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0510: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#PROFIL-COPY 2002 Irodatechnikai Kft. v Közigazgatási és Területfejlesztési Minisztérium.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic, social and territorial cohesion – EU funds – Management and control – Obligation for Member States to make arrangements to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning EU funds – National legislation excluding any judicial remedy against a decision ordering repayment of an EU grant on account of an irregularity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-510/24.
december 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0510_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#PROFIL-COPY 2002 Irodatechnikai Kft. v Közigazgatási és Területfejlesztési Minisztérium.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic, social and territorial cohesion – EU funds – Management and control – Obligation for Member States to make arrangements to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning EU funds – National legislation excluding any judicial remedy against a decision ordering repayment of an EU grant on account of an irregularity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-510/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0512: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#BÁV Zrt. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals – Annex XVII – Restrictions on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of certain dangerous substances, mixtures and articles – Restrictions concerning cadmium – Maximum concentration in metal parts of jewellery and imitation jewellery articles and hair accessories – Derogation – Silver bracelet dating from the 1940s, the brazing of which contains cadmium.#Case C-512/24.