oktober 17, 2025 0 15 CELEX:62024TJ0109_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 April 2025.#CL v European Commission.#Case T-109/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0110: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Lusosider-Aços Planos S. A. v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran and Russia – Imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties – Article 11(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-110/24.
februar 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0110_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Lusosider-Aços Planos S. A. v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran and Russia – Imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties – Article 11(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-110/24.
julij 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0113: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 July 2025 (Extracts).#Lattanzio KIBS SpA and Others v European Commission.#Public procurement – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Action for annulment – Lack of direct concern – Partial inadmissibility – Criteria for exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures – Concept of ‘final judgment that the person or entity is guilty’ – Article 136(1)(d)(ii) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Persons who have powers of representation, decision or control with regard to a person or entity who is excluded – Article 136(4)(a) of Regulation 2018/1046 – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality.#Case T-113/24.
julij 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0113_EXT: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 July 2025 (Extracts).#Lattanzio KIBS SpA and Others v European Commission.#Public procurement – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Action for annulment – Lack of direct concern – Partial inadmissibility – Criteria for exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures – Concept of ‘final judgment that the person or entity is guilty’ – Article 136(1)(d)(ii) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Persons who have powers of representation, decision or control with regard to a person or entity who is excluded – Article 136(4)(a) of Regulation 2018/1046 – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality.#Case T-113/24.
julij 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0113_RES: Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 23 juillet 2025 (Extraits).#Lattanzio KIBS SpA e.a. contre Commission européenne.#Marchés publics – Protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union – Recours en annulation – Défaut d’affectation directe – Irrecevabilité partielle – Critères d’exclusion de la participation aux procédures d’attribution des marchés publics – Notion de “jugement définitif établissant la culpabilité de la personne ou de l’entité” – Article 136, paragraphe 1, sous d), ii), du règlement (UE, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Personnes possédant des pouvoirs de représentation, de décision ou de contrôle à l’égard d’une personne ou entité se trouvant dans une situation d’exclusion – Article 136, paragraphe 4, sous a), du règlement 2018/1046 – Obligation de This document does not exist in English.
oktober 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0117: Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 8 octobre 2025.#CQ contre Comité économique et social européen.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Harcèlement moral – Enquête administrative – Article 12 bis du statut – Demande d’assistance – Rejet de la demande – Article 24 du statut – Obligation de motivation – Impartialité – Droit d’être entendu – Durée de la procédure administrative – Délai raisonnable – Erreur d’appréciation – Responsabilité – Préjudice moral.#Affaire T-117/24. This document does not exist in English.
marec 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0118: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Rosalia Vila Tobella v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark ROZALIYA jewelry for enlightenment – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Articles 94 and 95 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-118/24.
julij 31, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0118_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Rosalia Vila Tobella v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark ROZALIYA jewelry for enlightenment – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Articles 94 and 95 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-118/24.
julij 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0121: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative marks representing three Chinese characters – Word mark WANG LAO JI – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-121/24 to T-127/24.