Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0040: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTSOY – Earlier PDO ‘Port’ – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-40/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0040_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTSOY – Earlier PDO ‘Port’ – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-40/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0041:           Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 19 novembre 2025.#LGAI Technological Center, SA et jtsec Beyond IT Security, SL contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour le programme spatial.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Services d’accréditation de sécurité – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire – Règlement (UE) 2021/696 – Programme spatial – Condition selon laquelle l’entité juridique éligible n’est pas soumise au contrôle d’un pays tiers ou d’une entité de pays tiers – Droit d’être entendu – Obligation de motivation – Obligation d’examen des offres conforme aux critères énoncés dans les documents de marché – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Proportionnalité.#Affaire T-41/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0044: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Marzena Porczyńska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark gappol – Earlier EU word mark GAP – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 54(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Reimbursement of the c

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0044_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Marzena Porczyńska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark gappol – Earlier EU word mark GAP – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 54(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Reimbursement of t

RSS
First26722673267426752677267926802681Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top