Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024TA0172: Case T-172/24: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2025 – Asaş Alüminyum v EUIPO – Asfaltos del Sureste (ASAŞ) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ASAŞ – Earlier national figurative mark ASSA Asfaltos del Sureste, S.A. – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62024TA0173: Case T-173/24: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – DI v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Member of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing a reprimand on a Member of the Parliament – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Procedural deadlines – Misuse of powers – Concept of harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment)

0 0

CELEX:62024TA0174: Case T-174/24: Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2026 – Djchem Chemicals Poland and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v Commission (Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and certain mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of 1,4-Benzenediamine, N,N’-mixed Ph and tolyl derivs. – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity category 1B – Multi-constituent substance – Relevance of adverse effects in humans – Read-across – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Rights of the defence)

0 0

CELEX:62024TA0176: Case T-176/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2026 – Al Akhras v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Family membership criterion – Criterion of association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Freedom to conduct a business – R

0 0

CELEX:62024TA0188: Case T-188/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Administrative procedure – Decision ordering an inspection – Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Subject matter and purpose of the inspection – Obligation to state reasons – Sufficiently serious indicia – Protection of privacy – Judicial review)

RSS
First26332634263526362638264026412642Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top