Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CO0800: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#Tertianum Services AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a person who was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – EU trade mark – Articles 174 to 176 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Replacement of a party – Transfer of an intellectual property right during the proceedings before the General Court – No application for replacement.#Case C-800/24 P.

0 0

CELEX:62024CO0800_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#Tertianum Services AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a person who was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – EU trade mark – Articles 174 to 176 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Replacement of a party – Transfer of an intellectual property right during the proceedings before the General Court – No application for replacement.#Case C-800/24 P.

0 0

CELEX:62024CO0804(02): Order of the Court of 12 June 2025.#Polynt SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-804/24 P.

0 0

CELEX:62024CO0804(02)_INF: Order of the Court of 12 June 2025.#Polynt SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-804/24 P.

0 0

CELEX:62024CO0815:           Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 12 juin 2025.#Diamond Resorts Europe Limited (Sucursal en España) contre M.D. et J.D.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Compétences spéciales – Article 7, point 5 – Notions de “succursale”, d’“agence” ou de “tout autre établissement” – Action tendant à l’annulation de contrats d’utilisation à temps partagé de biens immobiliers.#Affaire C-815/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CO0823:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 10 juillet 2025.#KP e.a. contre Centro Servizi Culturali Santa Chiara.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Politique sociale – Directive 1999/70/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à durée déterminée – Clause 4 – Principe de non-discrimination – Absence de traitement moins favorable des travailleurs à durée déterminée – Octroi de certains éléments de rémunération uniquement aux travailleurs à durée indéterminée – Travailleurs à durée déterminée percevant une rémunération horaire plus élevée que celle des travailleurs à durée indéterminée.#Affaire C-823/24.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First26232624262526262628263026312632Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top