december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0296: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#SM e.a. contre Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 45 TFUE – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Égalité de traitement – Règlement (UE) no 492/2011 – Article 7, paragraphe 2 – Avantages sociaux – Allocation familiale – Condition d’octroi de cette allocation à un travailleur non-résident pour un enfant de son conjoint ou de son partenaire enregistré – Exigence selon laquelle ce travailleur doit “pourvoir à l’entretien” de cet enfant – Critères d’appréciation – Présomption fondée sur l’existence d’un domicile commun – Directive 2004/38/CE – Article 2, point 2, sous c) – Notion de “membre de la famille”.#Affaires jointes C-296/24 à C-306/24. This document does not exist in English.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0296_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#SM e.a. contre Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 45 TFUE – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Égalité de traitement – Règlement (UE) no 492/2011 – Article 7, paragraphe 2 – Avantages sociaux – Allocation familiale – Condition d’octroi de cette allocation à un travailleur non-résident pour un enfant de son conjoint ou de son partenaire enregistré – Exigence selon laquelle ce travailleur doit “pourvoir à l’entretien” de cet enfant – Critères d’appréciation – Présomption fondée sur l’existence d’un domicile commun – Directive 2004/38/CE – Article 2, point 2, sous c) – Notion de “membre de la famille”.#Affaires jointes C-296/24 à C-306/24. This document does not exist in English.
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0309: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Roberto Passalacqua contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaire – Promotion – Exercice de promotion 2021 – Décision de ne pas promouvoir le requérant au grade AD 11 – Article 45, paragraphe 1, du statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Comparaison des mérites – Obligation de motivation – Répartition de la charge de la preuve.#Affaire C-309/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
junij 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0310: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#YL v „Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad“ EAD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Scope – Electricity consumption inaccurately measured owing to meter malfunction – Billing on the basis of estimated electricity consumption – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EU – Scope – Unsolicited supply.#Case C-310/24.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0310_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#YL v „Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad“ EAD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Scope – Electricity consumption inaccurately measured owing to meter malfunction – Billing on the basis of estimated electricity consumption – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EU – Scope – Unsolicited supply.#Case C-310/24.
januar 29, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0311: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v M. GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Unfair competition – Unfair trading practices – Directive (EU) 2019/633 – Prohibition – Article 3(1)(d) – Payment request not related to the sale of the agricultural and food products of the supplier – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Power to impose fines – Classification as a ‘single infringement’ of a number of prohibited unfair trading practices giving rise to the imposition of a single fine – Principle ne bis in idem – National legislation providing for a cap on fines.#Case C-311/24.
junij 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0312: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#CL v Prokuratura na Republika Bulgaria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Scope – Processing of data collected in the course of an investigation against a police officer as a person suspected of a criminal offence – Recording of data relating to this investigation in the police officer’s personnel file – Lawfulness of processing – Point (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) and Article 6(3) of that regulation – Processing necessary for compliance with a legal obligation – Legal basis for the processing – Article 17 of that regulation – Right to erasure.#Case
junij 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0312_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#CL v Prokuratura na Republika Bulgaria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Scope – Processing of data collected in the course of an investigation against a police officer as a person suspected of a criminal offence – Recording of data relating to this investigation in the police officer’s personnel file – Lawfulness of processing – Point (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) and Article 6(3) of that regulation – Processing necessary for compliance with a legal obligation – Legal basis for the processing – Article 17 of that regulation – Right to erasure.#
februar 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0313: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting ‘on behalf or at the direction’ of an ‘entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph’ – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of its administrative board are Russian nationals and one of those Ru
februar 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0313_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting ‘on behalf or at the direction’ of an ‘entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph’ – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of