julij 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0099: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#G.M.K.-Z.B.M. v S.O.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 66 – Scope ratione temporis – Legal proceedings instituted by a claimant – Issue of an order for payment – Statement of opposition by the defendant to that order for payment seeking a review of the case concerned – Regulation (EU) No 44/2001 – Article 5(3) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Article 6(1) – More than one defendant – Article 22(1) – Exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable property – Action for payment of compensation for the non-contractual use of im
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0099_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#G.M.K.-Z.B.M. v S.O.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Koszalinie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 66 – Scope ratione temporis – Legal proceedings instituted by a claimant – Issue of an order for payment – Statement of opposition by the defendant to that order for payment seeking a review of the case concerned – Regulation (EU) No 44/2001 – Article 5(3) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Article 6(1) – More than one defendant – Article 22(1) – Exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable proper
maj 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0100: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025.#Verbraucherzentrale Hamburg e.V. v bonprix Handelsgesellschaft mbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Commercial communications – Article 6(c) – Concept of ‘promotional offers’ – Online advertising setting out a specific payment arrangement – Purchase on invoice involving a deferral of payment of the sales price – Information on the need for a prior assessment of the consumer’s creditworthiness only during the online ordering process.#Case C-100/24.
oktober 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0100_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025.#Verbraucherzentrale Hamburg e.V. v bonprix Handelsgesellschaft mbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Commercial communications – Article 6(c) – Concept of ‘promotional offers’ – Online advertising setting out a specific payment arrangement – Purchase on invoice involving a deferral of payment of the sales price – Information on the need for a prior assessment of the consumer’s creditworthiness only during the online ordering process.#Case C-100/24.
oktober 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0101: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Finanzamt Hamburg-Altona v XYRALITY GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 28 – Taking part in a supply of services – Articles 44 and 45 – Place of supply of services – Article 203 – VAT entered on an invoice – Electronically supplied services – App store – ‘In-app’ purchases.#Case C-101/24.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0101_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Finanzamt Hamburg-Altona v XYRALITY GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 28 – Taking part in a supply of services – Articles 44 and 45 – Place of supply of services – Article 203 – VAT entered on an invoice – Electronically supplied services – App store – ‘In-app’ purchases.#Case C-101/24.
oktober 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0110: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Sindicat de Treballadores i Treballadors de les Administracions i els Serveis Publics (STAS - IV) v Valenciana D’ Estrategies i Recursos per a la Sostenibilitat Ambiental SA (VAERSA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Point 1 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘working time’ – Works to improve protected natural areas – Time spent by workers travelling between a fixed point of departure and natural areas – Inclusion of that travelling time in the working time of those workers.#Case C-110/24.
december 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0110_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Sindicat de Treballadores i Treballadors de les Administracions i els Serveis Publics (STAS - IV) v Valenciana D’ Estrategies i Recursos per a la Sostenibilitat Ambiental SA (VAERSA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Point 1 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘working time’ – Works to improve protected natural areas – Time spent by workers travelling between a fixed point of departure and natural areas – Inclusion of that travelling time in the working time of those workers.#Case C-110/24.
julij 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0114: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Global Nanotechnologies AE schediasmou anaptyxis paraskevis kai emporias ylikon nanotechnologias (Glonatech) v European Research Executive Agency.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – The SANAD project – Staff costs – Eligible costs – Request for recovery – Debit note – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of good administration – Substitution of grounds – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to effective judicial protection – Burden of proof – Proportionality.#Case C-114/24 P.
julij 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0114_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Global Nanotechnologies AE schediasmou anaptyxis paraskevis kai emporias ylikon nanotechnologias (Glonatech) v European Research Executive Agency.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – The SANAD project – Staff costs – Eligible costs – Request for recovery – Debit note – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of good administration – Substitution of grounds – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to effective judicial protection – Burden of proof – Proportionality.#Case C-114/24 P.