Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0214: Case C-214/24, Hauptzollamt C: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof – Germany) – A v Hauptzollamt C (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer to the preliminary question which can be clearly deduced from the case-law or leaves no room for reasonable doubt – Harmonisation of legislation – Tax provisions – Directive 2008/118/EC – Excise duties on tobacco products – Excise goods – Goods imported irregularly into a Member State and transported to another Member State of destination – Taxation of goods – Determination of the competent Member State – Right of the transit State to tax those goods)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0235: Case C-235/24 PPU, Niesker: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Specialised Chamber of the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden – Netherlands) – S.A.H. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Recognition of judgments imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court or tribunal – Reassessment at the request of the minister – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0240: C-240/24, BNP Paribas Fortis (Reference for a preliminary ruling from a notary acting as a deputy for another notary): Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the zastępca notarialny zastępujący notariusza Justynę Gawlicę w Krapkowicach – (notary acting as a deputy for the notary Justyna Gawlica in Krapkowice, Poland)) – proceedings brought by N.T. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary acting as a deputy for another notary – Definition of court or tribunal – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Measures relating to the European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Refusal by a bank to recognise the Europ

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0241: Case C-241/24, Tsenochev: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Pleven, Bulgaria) – criminal proceedings against M. N. D., Y. G. Ts. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute or the proceedings in the main action and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0255: Case C-225/24, Shkotareva: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against KM (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/29/EU – Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime – Victim suffering from a physical or mental impairment – Procedural rights of that person – National rules not affording a victim access to the competent criminal court in order to claim infringement of his or her rights under EU law – Possibility for the victim to claim such infringement only before a civil court – Principle of effectiveness

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0264: Case C-264/24, Gašlić: Order of the Court of 20 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu – Croatia) – MH v BR (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Applicability – External element – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0265: Case C-265/24, Stadtgemeinde Rattenberg: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Aue-Bad Schlema – Germany) – BN v Stadtgemeinde Rattenberg (Request for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

RSS
First25442545254625472549255125522553Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top