Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CA0901: Case C-901/24, Falucka: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – mBank S.A. v TK, DJ and JJ (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 7(1) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Effects of a term being found to be unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Actions for restitution – Limitation period for the action brought by the seller or supplier – Interruption of the limitation period – Acknowledgement by a consumer of his or her debt owed to a credit institution – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of proportionality – Right of access to a court – Unjust enrichment)

0 0

CELEX:62024CA0902: Case C-902/24, Herchoski: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – RM, EM v Santander Bank Polska S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency and containing unfair terms – Effects of the finding that a contractual term is unfair – Void agreement – National case-law providing for two independent claims for restitution – Consumer action seeking repayment of monthly payments made under the agreement – Claim of the seller or supplier corresponding to the amount of the loan – Recovery – Right of the seller or supplier

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0001: Case C-1/24, Achmea Schadeverzekeringen: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the College voor de Rechten van de Mens – Netherlands) – X v Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court or tribunal – College voor de Rechten van de Mens (Institute for Human Rights, Netherlands) – Compulsory jurisdiction – Non-binding decision – Manifest inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0024: Joined Cases C-24/24 to C-27/24, LAV and Others: Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 December 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale regionale di giustizia amministrativa della Regione autonoma Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol – Italy) – Lega Anti Vivisezione (LAV) and Others v Provincia autonoma di Trento, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA), Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Sicurezza energetica (References for a preliminary ruling – Disputes in the main proceedings which have become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0028: Joined Cases C-28/24 to C-31/24, LEAL Lega Antivivisezionista – II: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 December 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale regionale di giustizia amministrativa della Regione autonoma Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol – Italy) – LEAL Lega Antivivisezionista ODV and Others v Provincia autonoma di Trento, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA) (References for a preliminary ruling – Disputes in the main proceedings which have become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)

RSS
First25222523252425252527252925302531Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top