junij 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0292: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#AD v Iberia, Líneas Aéreas de España, SA Operadora Unipersonal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – International air transport – Montreal Convention – Air carrier liability – Article 19 – Damage occasioned by delay in the carriage by air of passengers, baggage or cargo – Article 31(2) – Timely notice of complaints – Complaint before the date on which the baggage concerned was placed at the disposal of the person entitled to delivery of it.#Case C-292/24.
december 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0292_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#AD v Iberia, Líneas Aéreas de España, SA Operadora Unipersonal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – International air transport – Montreal Convention – Air carrier liability – Article 19 – Damage occasioned by delay in the carriage by air of passengers, baggage or cargo – Article 31(2) – Timely notice of complaints – Complaint before the date on which the baggage concerned was placed at the disposal of the person entitled to delivery of it.#Case C-292/24.
julij 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0294: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#„Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia“ EAD v ED.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) – Contract for the provision of water and wastewater services – Date on which the claim becomes due and the starting-point of the limitation period of the claim – Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details – Inadmissibility.#Case C-294/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0294_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#„Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia“ EAD v ED.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad - Burgas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) – Contract for the provision of water and wastewater services – Date on which the claim becomes due and the starting-point of the limitation period of the claim – Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details – Inadmissibility.#Case C-294/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0296: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#SM e.a. contre Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 45 TFUE – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Égalité de traitement – Règlement (UE) no 492/2011 – Article 7, paragraphe 2 – Avantages sociaux – Allocation familiale – Condition d’octroi de cette allocation à un travailleur non-résident pour un enfant de son conjoint ou de son partenaire enregistré – Exigence selon laquelle ce travailleur doit “pourvoir à l’entretien” de cet enfant – Critères d’appréciation – Présomption fondée sur l’existence d’un domicile commun – Directive 2004/38/CE – Article 2, point 2, sous c) – Notion de “membre de la famille”.#Affaires jointes C-296/24 à C-306/24. This document does not exist in English.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0296_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#SM e.a. contre Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 45 TFUE – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Égalité de traitement – Règlement (UE) no 492/2011 – Article 7, paragraphe 2 – Avantages sociaux – Allocation familiale – Condition d’octroi de cette allocation à un travailleur non-résident pour un enfant de son conjoint ou de son partenaire enregistré – Exigence selon laquelle ce travailleur doit “pourvoir à l’entretien” de cet enfant – Critères d’appréciation – Présomption fondée sur l’existence d’un domicile commun – Directive 2004/38/CE – Article 2, point 2, sous c) – Notion de “membre de la famille”.#Affaires jointes C-296/24 à C-306/24. This document does not exist in English.
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0309: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Roberto Passalacqua contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaire – Promotion – Exercice de promotion 2021 – Décision de ne pas promouvoir le requérant au grade AD 11 – Article 45, paragraphe 1, du statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Comparaison des mérites – Obligation de motivation – Répartition de la charge de la preuve.#Affaire C-309/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
junij 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0310: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#YL v „Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad“ EAD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Scope – Electricity consumption inaccurately measured owing to meter malfunction – Billing on the basis of estimated electricity consumption – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EU – Scope – Unsolicited supply.#Case C-310/24.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0310_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#YL v „Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad“ EAD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Scope – Electricity consumption inaccurately measured owing to meter malfunction – Billing on the basis of estimated electricity consumption – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EU – Scope – Unsolicited supply.#Case C-310/24.
januar 29, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0311: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v M. GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Unfair competition – Unfair trading practices – Directive (EU) 2019/633 – Prohibition – Article 3(1)(d) – Payment request not related to the sale of the agricultural and food products of the supplier – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Power to impose fines – Classification as a ‘single infringement’ of a number of prohibited unfair trading practices giving rise to the imposition of a single fine – Principle ne bis in idem – National legislation providing for a cap on fines.#Case C-311/24.