februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0016: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v YR and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – National rules on how cases are allocated among the judges of a given court – Allocation of cases by the head of court management – Power of the judge assigned to verify the lawfulness of the allocation.#Case C-16/24.
oktober 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0016_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against YR and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – National rules on how cases are allocated among the judges of a given court – Allocation of cases by the head of court management – Power of the judge assigned to verify the lawfulness of the allocation.#Case C-16/24.
junij 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0017: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#CeramTec GmbH v Coorstek Bioceramics LLC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 52(1)(a) and (b) – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Bad faith of the applicant – Autonomy and coexistence of the absolute grounds for invalidity – Criteria relevant to determining whether an applicant is acting in bad faith when filing an application for a trade mark – Matters arising after that application is filed.#Case C-17/24.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0017_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#CeramTec GmbH v Coorstek Bioceramics LLC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 52(1)(a) and (b) – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Bad faith of the applicant – Autonomy and coexistence of the absolute grounds for invalidity – Criteria relevant to determining whether an applicant is acting in bad faith when filing an application for a trade mark – Matters arising after that application is filed.#Case C-17/24.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0018: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#NOVIS Insurance Company, NOVIS Versicherungsgesellschaft, NOVIS Compagnia di Assicurazioni, NOVIS Poisťovňa a.s. v Česká národní banka.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services – Single insurance market – Directive 2009/138/EC – Principle of supervision by the home Member State – Article 155 – Competencies of the supervisory authorities of the host Member State – Cooperation with the authorities of the home Member State – Insurance undertaking not complying with the legal provisions applicable in the host Member State – Provisions concerned – Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 – Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) – Directive (EU) 2016/97
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0018_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 22 janvier 2026.#NOVIS Insurance Company, NOVIS Versicherungsgesellschaft, NOVIS Compagnia di Assicurazioni, NOVIS Poisťovňa a.s. contre Česká národní banka.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Liberté d’établissement et libre prestation des services – Marché unique de l’assurance – Directive 2009/138/CE – Principe du contrôle par l’État membre d’origine – Article 155 – Compétences des autorités de contrôle de l’État membre d’accueil – Coopération avec les autorités de l’État membre d’origine – Entreprise d’assurance ne se conformant pas aux dispositions légales applicables dans l’État membre d’accueil – Dispositions concernées – Règlement (UE) no 1286/2014 – Produits d’investissement packagés de détail et fondés sur l’assurance – This document does not exist in English.
marec 07, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0020: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of providing payment.#Case C-20/24.
maj 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0020_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of providing payment.#Case C-20/24.
september 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0021: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#CP v Nissan Iberia SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness – Actions for damages for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Limitation period – Determination of the dies a quo – Knowledge of the information necessary for bringing an action for damages – Publication on the website of a national competition authority of its decision finding an infringement of the competition rules – Binding effect of a decision of a national competition authority which is not yet final – Suspension or interruption of the limitation period – Stay of the main proceedings before the court hearing an action for damages – Directive
september 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0021_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 4 septembre 2025.#CP contre Nissan Iberia SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 101 TFUE – Principe d’effectivité – Actions en dommages et intérêts pour les infractions aux dispositions du droit de la concurrence des États membres et de l’Union européenne – Délai de prescription – Détermination du dies a quo – Connaissance des informations indispensables pour l’introduction de l’action en dommages et intérêts – Publication sur le site Internet d’une autorité nationale de concurrence de sa décision constatant une infraction aux règles de concurrence – Effet contraignant d’une décision d’une autorité nationale de concurrence non encore définitive – Suspension ou interruption du délai de prescription – Suspension de la procé This document does not exist in English.