Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0336: CaseC-336/24, SINHRON INVEST: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – SINHRON INVEST EOOD v Sofiyska gradska prokuratura (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions referred for a preliminary ruling that are identical to questions on which the Court has already ruled – Article 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Presumption of innocence and rights of the defence – Imposition of a criminal penalty on a legal person for an offence relating to value added tax (VAT) committed by the representative of that legal person – Parallel criminal proceedings against that representative that have no

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0372: CaseC-372/24, Ministarstvo pravosuđa (Remuneration of Croatian judges of first instance): Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Rijeci – Croatia) – B. B. v Ministarstvo pravosuđa, uprave i digitalne transformacije Republike Hrvatske (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Remuneration of judges of first instance – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rule

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0374: Case C-374/24, UNMLibres – II: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail du Brabant wallon – Division Nivelles – Belgium) – UF v Union Nationale des Mutualités Libres (Partenamut) (UNMLibres) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0388: Joined Cases C-388/24 and C-389/24, Oguta and Others: Order of the President of the Court of 30 September 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Firenze – Italy) – GK (C-388/24), QS, OY, LH, WM (C-389/24) v Ministero dell’Interno, Commissione Territoriale per la Protezione Internazionale di Firenze – Sezione di Perugia, Commissione Territoriale per la Protezione Internazionale di Firenze – Sezione di Livorno (C-389/24)

RSS
First24512452245324542456245824592460Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top