Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0181: Case C-181/24, Genmab: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – Genmab A/S (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Medicinal product for human use – Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (SPC) – Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 – Conditions for granting – Article 3(d) – First marketing authorisation (MA) – Medicinal products containing the same active ingredient being granted several MAs – Withdrawal of the prior MA)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0201: Case C-201/24, A.En. Slovensko: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky – Slovakia) – A.En. Slovensko s.r.o. v Úrad pre vybrané hospodárske subjekty, Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Common system of taxation applicable to companies – Directive 2009/133/EC – National legislation charging a special levy on capital gains resulting from a transfer of assets between companies established in the same Member State – Article 4(1) and Article 9 – Requirement that capital gains resulting from a transfer of assets not be subject to tax – Purely internal situation – Jurisdiction of the Court)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0214: Case C-214/24, Hauptzollamt C: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof – Germany) – A v Hauptzollamt C (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer to the preliminary question which can be clearly deduced from the case-law or leaves no room for reasonable doubt – Harmonisation of legislation – Tax provisions – Directive 2008/118/EC – Excise duties on tobacco products – Excise goods – Goods imported irregularly into a Member State and transported to another Member State of destination – Taxation of goods – Determination of the competent Member State – Right of the transit State to tax those goods)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0235: Case C-235/24 PPU, Niesker: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Specialised Chamber of the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden – Netherlands) – S.A.H. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Recognition of judgments imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court or tribunal – Reassessment at the request of the minister – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0240: C-240/24, BNP Paribas Fortis (Reference for a preliminary ruling from a notary acting as a deputy for another notary): Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the zastępca notarialny zastępujący notariusza Justynę Gawlicę w Krapkowicach – (notary acting as a deputy for the notary Justyna Gawlica in Krapkowice, Poland)) – proceedings brought by N.T. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary acting as a deputy for another notary – Definition of court or tribunal – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Measures relating to the European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Refusal by a bank to recognise the Europ

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0241: Case C-241/24, Tsenochev: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Pleven, Bulgaria) – criminal proceedings against M. N. D., Y. G. Ts. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute or the proceedings in the main action and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

RSS
First24502451245224532455245724582459Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top