Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0136: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vintae – Earlier national word mark VITAE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 53(2) of Regulation No 40/94.#Case T-136/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0136_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vintae – Earlier national word mark VITAE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 53(2) of Regulation No 40/94.#Case T-136/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0138: Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Semmelweis Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Intensity of judicial review – Proportionality – Error of assessment – Misuse of powers.#Case T-138/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0138_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Semmelweis Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Intensity of judicial review – Proportionality – Error of assessment – Misuse of powers.#Case T-138

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0139: Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Miskolci Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Article 4(1) of Regulation 2020/2092 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence – Intensity of judic

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0139_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Miskolci Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Article 4(1) of Regulation 2020/2092 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence – Intensity of j

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0140: Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Dunaújvárosi Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Article 4(1) of Regulation 2020/2092 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence – Intensity of j

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0140_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Dunaújvárosi Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Article 4(1) of Regulation 2020/2092 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence – Intensity

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0141:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre élargie) du 13 novembre 2024.#Laurent Merlin e.a. contre Commission européenne.#Recours en carence – Aides d’État – Politique commune de la pêche – Financements en faveur des armateurs exerçant la pêche à l’aide de chaluts à perche associée à l’utilisation du courant électrique impulsionnel – Plainte – Recevabilité – Prise de position de la Commission – Caractère clair et définitif de la prise de position – Compétence de la Commission – Obligation d’agir.#Affaire T-141/23.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0141_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Laurent Merlin and Others v European Commission.#Action for failure to act – State aid – Common fisheries policy – Funding for shipowners fishing with beam trawl using electrical pulse current – Complaint – Admissibility – Definition of a position by the Commission – Clear and definitive nature of the position adopted – Competence of the Commission – Obligation to act.#Case T-141/23.

RSS
First23802381238223832385238723882389Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top