Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1119_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Lagardère SA v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Request for information – Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Necessity of the information requested – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Impossibilium nulla obligatio est – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to respect for private and family life – Documents stored on personal communication tools and applications – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expression – Protection of journalistic sources.#Case T-1119/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1122: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 November 2025.#Nouryon Functional Chemicals BV and Others v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substance di-tert-butyl 1,1,4,4-tetramethyltetramethylene diperoxide – Compliance check of registrations – Request for additional toxicity studies – Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Error of fact – Proportionality – Decision of the Board of Appeal of ECHA – Admissibility of the arguments directed against the decision of ECHA.#Case T-1122/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1122_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 November 2025.#Nouryon Functional Chemicals BV and Others v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substance di-tert-butyl 1,1,4,4-tetramethyltetramethylene diperoxide – Compliance check of registrations – Request for additional toxicity studies – Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Error of fact – Proportionality – Decision of the Board of Appeal of ECHA – Admissibility of the arguments directed against the decision of ECHA.#Case T-1122/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1127: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Sven Butzkies-Schiemann v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CorrosionX – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Admissibility of the response filed before the Board of Appeal – Article 24(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-1127/23.

RSS
First23702371237223732375237723782379Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top