Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1047_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#AF v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Administrative investigation – Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Disciplinary proceedings without consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Warning – Principle of impartiality – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Protection of personal data – Reimbursement of costs – Article 21 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-1047/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1049:           Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre élargie) du 23 juillet 2025.#Bloom contre Commission européenne.#Politique commune de la pêche – Résolution de la CTOI relative à la gestion des dispositifs de concentration de poissons – Objection de la Commission – Rejet de la demande de réexamen interne – Article 10, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CE) no 1367/2006 – Acte susceptible de faire l’objet d’une demande de réexamen interne – Notion de “dispositions qui peuvent aller à l’encontre du droit de l’environnement” – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous f), du règlement no 1367/2006.#Affaire T-1049/23.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1049_RES:           Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre élargie) du 23 juillet 2025.#Bloom contre Commission européenne.#Politique commune de la pêche – Résolution de la CTOI relative à la gestion des dispositifs de concentration de poissons – Objection de la Commission – Rejet de la demande de réexamen interne – Article 10, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CE) no 1367/2006 – Acte susceptible de faire l’objet d’une demande de réexamen interne – Notion de “dispositions qui peuvent aller à l’encontre du droit de l’environnement” – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous f), du règlement no 1367/2006.#Affaire T-1049/23.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1052: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#UH v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Supporting higher legal education in a third State – Performance of a service contract – Contractor’s grave professional misconduct and significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – OLAF investigation – Exclusion from public procurement procedures for a period of two years – Existence of a consortium – Error of fact – Error of law – Legal certainty – Limitation – Non-retroactivity.#Case T-1052/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1052_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#UH v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Supporting higher legal education in a third State – Performance of a service contract – Contractor’s grave professional misconduct and significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – OLAF investigation – Exclusion from public procurement procedures for a period of two years – Existence of a consortium – Error of fact – Error of law – Legal certainty – Limitation – Non-retroactivity.#Case T-1052/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1053: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 January 2025.#Tecom Master, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MK MICHAEL MICHELE – Earlier EU figurative mark MK MICHAEL KORS – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-1053/23.

RSS
First23692370237123722374237623772378Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top