februar 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ0351_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Kern Pharma, SL v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Variation of the marketing authorisation for Tecfidera – Dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 14(11) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-351/23.
april 26, 2024 0 40 CELEX:62023TJ0357: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2024.#Verla-Pharm Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-357/23.
februar 01, 2025 0 35 CELEX:62023TJ0357_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2024.#Verla-Pharm Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-357/23.
julij 05, 2024 0 22 CELEX:62023TJ0358: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 July 2024.#AC Marca Brands, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-358/23.
november 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ0359: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect – Earlier EU word mark ONE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Res judicata – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-359/23.
junij 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ0359_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect – Earlier EU word mark ONE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Res judicata – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-359/23.
oktober 24, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ0361: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Väderstad Holding AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Applications for EU trade marks consisting of the position of a combination of presentational features – Subject matter of the dispute – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-361/23 to T-364/23.
februar 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ0361_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Väderstad Holding AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Applications for EU trade marks consisting of the position of a combination of presentational features – Subject matter of the dispute – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-361/23 to T-364/23.
junij 07, 2024 0 32 CELEX:62023TJ0365: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 June 2024.#Habitat Barcelona Unión Constructora SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-365/23.
februar 01, 2025 0 34 CELEX:62023TJ0365_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 June 2024.#Habitat Barcelona Unión Constructora SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-365/23.