avgust 19, 2024 0 36 CELEX:62023TB1035: Case T-1035/23: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2024 – Mendes v EUIPO – Actial Farmaceutica (BIFIDOBACTERIUM LONGUM DSM24736)
julij 29, 2024 0 29 CELEX:62023TB1037: Case T-1037/23: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2024 – UB v Frontex
julij 29, 2024 0 31 CELEX:62023TB1038: Case T-1038/23: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2024 – UB v Frontex
avgust 19, 2024 0 96 CELEX:62023TB1039: Case T-1039/23: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2024 – Mendes v EUIPO – Actial Farmaceutica (STREPTOCOCCUS THERMOPHILUS DSM24731)
avgust 19, 2024 0 40 CELEX:62023TB1040: Case T-1040/23: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2024 – Mendes v EUIPO – Actial Farmaceutica (BIFIDOBACTERIUM INFANTIS DSM24737)
avgust 19, 2024 0 37 CELEX:62023TB1041: Case T-1041/23: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2024 – Mendes v EUIPO – Actial Farmaceutica (BIFIDOBACTERIUM BREVE DSM24732)
junij 03, 2024 0 33 CELEX:62023TB1043: Case T-1043/23: Order of the General Court of 10 April 2024 – momox v EUIPO – Nyky (momox FASHION)
november 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TB1045: Case T-1045/23: Order of the General Court of 18 September 2024 – France v Commission (Civil service – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/403/23 – Rules on language – Discrimination based on language – Restriction of the choice of Language 2 to English – Amending notice – Possibility of sitting the tests in any of the 24 official languages of the European Union – No need to adjudicate)
maj 06, 2024 0 23 CELEX:62023TB1051: Case T-1051/23: Order of the General Court of 13 March 2024 – Pomilio Blumm v EUIPO
december 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TB1056: Case T-1056/23: Order of the General Court of 15 October 2024 – Pilatus Bank v ECB (Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw the authorisation of the credit institution – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility)