maj 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ1144_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Enedo Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application.#Case T-1144/23.
november 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ1146: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#W. L. Gore & Associates Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Cardioflow – Earlier EU word mark CARDIOFORM – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1146/23.
februar 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ1146_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#W. L. Gore & Associates Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Cardioflow – Earlier EU word mark CARDIOFORM – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1146/23.
oktober 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ1148: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 22 octobre 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) contre Commission européenne.#Produits phytopharmaceutiques – Modalités d’identification des coformulants inacceptables dans les produits phytopharmaceutiques – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2023/574 – Rejet de la demande de réexamen interne – Article 10, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CE) no 1367/2006 – Contrôle des coformulants – Article 27 du règlement (CE) no 1107/2009.#Affaire T-1148/23. This document does not exist in English.
december 13, 2024 0 30 CELEX:62023TJ1150: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 December 2024.#Apoio XXI - Centro de Apoio Psico-Pedagógico Lda v European Union Drugs Agency.#Case T-1150/23.
april 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ1153: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 April 2025.#Ardeshir Ghiassi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark VITAE – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptive character – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1153/23.
september 26, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ1153_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 April 2025.#Ardeshir Ghiassi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark VITAE – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptive character – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1153/23.
maj 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ1154: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Taxolutions BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity.#Case T-1154/23.
januar 15, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ1154_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Taxolutions BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity.#Case T-1154/23.
marec 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TJ1158: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#deluxe holding ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing electric candles – Ground for invalidity – Lack of individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Articles 4 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-1158/23.