Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1127: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Sven Butzkies-Schiemann v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CorrosionX – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Admissibility of the response filed before the Board of Appeal – Article 24(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-1127/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1127_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Sven Butzkies-Schiemann v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CorrosionX – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Admissibility of the response filed before the Board of Appeal – Article 24(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-1127/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1129: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – ‘Naked’ restrictions – Consequences of the annulment in part of an earlier decision – Nature of the infringement – Amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Proportionality – Whether appropriate – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-1129/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1129_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – ‘Naked’ restrictions – Consequences of the annulment in part of an earlier decision – Nature of the infringement – Amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Proportionality – Whether appropriate – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-1129/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1132: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Olvi Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark FIZZ Cider – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-1132/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023TJ1132_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 23 octobre 2024.#Olvi Oyj contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque figurative FIZZ Cider – Causes de nullité absolue – Caractère descriptif – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), et article 51, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (CE) no 40/94 [devenu article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), et article 59, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001] – Éléments de preuve produits pour la première fois devant la chambre de recours – Article 95, paragraphe 2, du règlement 2017/1001 – Article 27, paragraphe 4, du règlement délégué (UE) 2018/625 – Obligation de motivation – Droit d’être ente

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First23112312231323142316231823192320Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top