Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1095: Case T-1095/23: Judgment of the General Court of 23 July 2025 – OT v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Proportionality)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1096: Case T-1096/23: Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2025 – Lotus Bakeries v EUIPO (Combination of the colours red and white) (EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours red and white – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Request for referral to the Grand Chamber – Article 28 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1097: Case T-1097/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 June 2026 – Vivendi v Commission (Competition – Concentrations – Request for information – Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Choice of legal base – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Not arbitrary – Impossibilium nulla obligatio est – Proportionality – Necessity of the information requested – Article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Freedom of expression – Protection of journalistic sources – Plea of illegality – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to respect for private and family life)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA1102: Case T-1102/23: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2025 – DJO v EUIPO – Hallufix and Huber [Gouttières (bandages chirurgicaux)] (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing an orthosis for hallux valgus – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)

RSS
First22762277227822792281228322842285Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top