december 23, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0520: Order of the Court of 15 December 2023.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-520/23 P.
februar 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0520_INF: Order of the Court of 15 December 2023.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-520/23 P.
december 23, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0521: Order of the Court of 15 December 2023.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-521/23 P.
februar 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0521_INF: Order of the Court of 15 December 2023.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-521/23 P.
april 19, 2024 0 69 CELEX:62023CO0522(01): Rectification order of 9 April 2024.#NO v European Commission.#Rectification order.#Case C-522/23 P.
februar 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0522: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NO v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Obligation imposed on a solicitor to transfer fees to a competitor – Decision of the European Commission finding that the measure in question does not constitute State aid – Action for annulment in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-522/23 P.
januar 29, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0522_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NO v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Obligation imposed on a solicitor to transfer fees to a competitor – Decision of the European Commission finding that the measure in question does not constitute State aid – Action for annulment in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-522/23 P.
december 15, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0523: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 7 December 2023.#Biocom California v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – Decision declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Action for annulment – Association of undertakings active in the relevant sector with the purpose of defending the interests of its members – Interest in the result of the case.#Case C-523/23 P(I).
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0523_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 7 December 2023.#Biocom California v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – Decision declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Action for annulment – Association of undertakings active in the relevant sector with the purpose of defending the interests of its members – Interest in the result of the case.#Case C-523/23 P(I).
april 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0528: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v KD.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Member of the temporary staff of EUIPO – Non-renewal of contract – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-528/23 P.